Writing Hub
AI governance essays, reasoning systems notes, experiment logs, and technical writing across BioAI and engineering practice.
Project Topics
STEM-BIO-AI Audit Report: yorkeccak/bio
When a README Claim Meets a Deterministic Scanner

Beyond Repo Scanning: How AIRI Expanded the Risk Vocabulary in STEM BIO-AI 1.7.x
How STEM BIO-AI uses the MIT AI Risk Repository as a governed local risk-vocabulary layer without replacing deterministic repository scanning

When Control Becomes Authority: Calibration Governance in STEM BIO-AI 1.7.x
Why STEM BIO-AI treats calibration as governed policy instead of a free-form score-tuning console for bio and medical AI repository audits.

Building a Deterministic Governance Kernel: Separating Custody from Truth
CGF separates domain truth from custody mechanics, turning AI governance from Markdown/YAML policy language into deterministic, inspectable artifacts.

Role Separation Is Not Verification: The Structural Failures Hidden in Your Multi-Agent Pipeline
A research-backed breakdown of why agent role design alone does not produce reliable audits — and what actually does

From Score to Workflow: Turning STEM BIO-AI Into a Local Audit System
Bio/medical AI trust should not collapse into one score. STEM BIO-AI v1.6.2 shows how deterministic auditing, evidence-led diagnostics, regulatory traceability, and bounded AI advisory can become an inspectable local workflow.

Each /slop Is a Calibration Signal — AI-SLOP Detector v3.6.0 and the Claude Code Skill
Every /slop invocation records to a project-scoped history. After 10 re-scanned files, bounded self-calibration adjusts detection weights for your codebase. Here is the mechanism, the data, and what actually shipped in v3.6.0.

How Do You Trust the AI Auditor? STEM-AI v1.1.2 and Memory-Contracted Bio-AI Audits
STEM-AI v1.1.2 binds a bio/medical AI repository audit to a machine-checkable memory contract, then demonstrates it on a real open-source bioinformatics repository.

When an AI Pipeline Passes — But One Path Still Must Be Held: EXP-034
EXP-034 tested whether a method-locked Bio-AI governance pipeline could survive modal expansion, AlphaFold EBI observer wiring, and AG-live measurement without breaking its PASS/BLOCK judgment baseline.

The Sheepwave Has a New Shape: OpenMythos and the Rise of Architecture Hype
A technical-opinion essay on OpenMythos, Claude Mythos, README-driven AI hype, and why architecture claims need source-level verification before becoming public belief.

The Difference Between a Harness and a Leash
A practical essay on why most AI 'harnesses' are still leashes: guides shape behavior, but only justified external measurement creates a real governance boundary.

OpenMythos v0.5.0 Code Review - Audit Report
OpenMythos collected thousands of GitHub stars and dominated AI discourse for a week. This is what happens when you actually read the code — and why the people who do always arrive too late to matter.
Showing page 1 of 2 · 24 matching posts