Request an Audit
Tell Flamehaven what you built, where AI is involved, and where the system feels fragile, unjustified, or hard to trust under pressure.
Direct founder contact · Response within 1-2 business days
Start with a direct brief
You do not need a perfect brief. A repo link, product summary, workflow outline, or rough concern is enough to start.
Direct email stays available if your environment blocks form submission.
Best starting points
These are the most common ways teams begin working with Flamehaven.
- Quick Audit for an AI workflow, RAG system, or agent stack that already feels fragile
- Deep Report for products with visible drift, weak grounding, or unclear claim boundaries
- Governance Blueprint for decision-sensitive, regulated, or high-risk deployments
- Founder-led review when you need a technical answer before expanding use
What Happens Next
Initial triage
I review the problem, current architecture, and main risk areas to determine whether the issue is advisory, implementation, or validation-heavy.
Scope definition
If there is a fit, the work is framed as review, rebuild, or verification and the expected deliverables are made explicit before deeper execution.
Execution path
Most engagements resolve into an architecture package, a targeted implementation sprint, or a deeper governance and verification build.
Good fit signals
The strongest fits are teams with real deployment pressure, a clear risk surface, and a willingness to make architectural decisions rather than cosmetic prompt tweaks.
If you already have diagrams, repo context, or a current system brief, include that in the first message.