Writing Hub
AI governance essays, reasoning systems notes, experiment logs, and technical writing across BioAI and engineering practice.
Project Topics
How Do You Trust the AI Auditor? STEM-AI v1.1.2 and Memory-Contracted Bio-AI Audits
STEM-AI v1.1.2 binds a bio/medical AI repository audit to a machine-checkable memory contract, then demonstrates it on a real open-source bioinformatics repository.
When an AI Pipeline Passes — But One Path Still Must Be Held: EXP-034
EXP-034 tested whether a method-locked Bio-AI governance pipeline could survive modal expansion, AlphaFold EBI observer wiring, and AG-live measurement without breaking its PASS/BLOCK judgment baseline.
The $100 Million Blind Spot: What No-Code Healthcare Builders Still Don't See
An analysis of how no-code and AI-generated healthcare apps create regulatory liability when patient data flows are deployed without prior mapping, auditability, or compliance architecture.
How Auditing 10 Bio-AI Repositories Shaped STEM-AI
After auditing 10 open-source Bio-AI repositories, we found blind spots in STEM-AI and expanded it from text-only review to code-aware trust evaluation.
I Audited 10 Open-Source Bio-AI Repos. Most Could Produce Outputs. Few Could Establish Trust.
I audited 10 visible repositories. Most could produce outputs. Very few could establish what those outputs meant.
Bio-AI Repository Audit 2026: A Technical Report on 10 Open-Source Systems
We audited 10 prominent open-source Bio-AI repositories using code inspection and STEM-AI trust scoring. 8 of 10 scored T0: trust not established. Here is what the code actually shows.
Medical AI Repositories Need More Than Benchmarks. We Built STEM-AI to Audit Trust
STEM-AI is a governance audit framework for public medical AI repositories. It scores README integrity, cross-platform consistency, and code infrastructure — because benchmarks alone don't tell you if a bio-AI tool is safe to trust.
How do you know when your entire AI pipeline is wrong — not just one model? (EXP-033)
EXP-033 shows how to validate an entire AI pipeline, not just one model, using five-gate checkpoints, reproducible PASS/BLOCK parity, AlphaGenome on/off testing, and fully traceable governance decisions.
What AI Changed About Research Code — and What It Didn’t
The old bottleneck was writing the code. The new bottleneck is proving that the code still means what the theory meant.
What an AI Reasoning Engine Built for Alzheimer's Metabolic Research: A Code Walkthrough
A code walkthrough of an AI reasoning engine for Alzheimer’s metabolic research, showing how literature ingestion, causal inference, and executable biomarker scaffolds generate falsifiable pre-validation hypotheses.
From Fail-Closed Blocking to Reproducible PASS/BLOCK Separation (EXP-032B)
A validation study showing how EXP-032B achieved reproducible PASS/BLOCK separation across A/B/C control arms by patching false-blocking causes, improving observability, and measuring replay drift under observer-shadow conditions.
Chaos Engineering for AI: Validating a Fail-Closed Pipeline with Fake Data and Math
A case study in AI governance showing how synthetic invalid inputs, structural disagreement, SIDRCE ethics checks, and end-to-end reliability scoring triggered a safe BLOCK verdict in a biomedical pipeline.
Showing page 1 of 2 · 21 matching posts