Writing Hub
AI governance essays, reasoning systems notes, experiment logs, and technical writing across BioAI and engineering practice.
Project Topics
The Difference Between a Harness and a Leash
A practical essay on why most AI 'harnesses' are still leashes: guides shape behavior, but only justified external measurement creates a real governance boundary.
The Next AI Moat May Not Be the Harness Alone: A Mathematically Governed Self-Calibrating Code-Review Layer
As AI harness patterns normalize, differentiation is shifting toward governed self-calibration and implementation fidelity. This piece explores how history-driven, bounded adaptation creates a new layer of defensible AI infrastructure — one that turns local code evolution into a competitive moat.
My AI Maintainer Kept Making Wrong Calls. So I Made It Report Its State Before Touching Anything.
Part 6 moves from landscape to operation. This is what MICA looks like when it is actually running inside a real maintenance workflow — session report, self-test, drift, invariants, and operator judgment.
Prompt → RAG → MCP → Agent → Harness, and What?
Why the next layer in AI may be governance infrastructure, not just better agents.
Everyone Was Talking About Context Engineering. Nobody Had Solved Governance.
Everyone Was Talking About Context Engineering. Nobody Had Solved Governance.
The Model Already Read the README. MICA v0.1.8 Made It a Protocol
v0.1.7 made scoring a contract with fail-closed gates. v0.1.8 recognized that README-first behavior could serve as invocation — and formalized it as a schema-level protocol. This article uses simplified examples to show how the invocation gap that had existed since v0.0.1 was finally closed
The Stake Was Governance Outside the Schema. MICA v0.1.5 Pulled It In
v0.1.0 through v0.1.4 made the schema more implementable. v0.1.5 was the first version to ask a different question — what if governance itself belongs inside the schema? Here is what that looked like, and what it still could not do.
The Schema Existed. The Model Had No Way to Know.
v0.0.1 proved that context could be structured. It did not prove that the structure could govern what shaped the session. Three failures — and why only one made the others meaningless.
My LLM Kept Forgetting My Project. So I Built a Governance Schema.
Session loss isn't a UX inconvenience — it's a structural failure with compounding consequences for long-running AI projects. This post defines the problem precisely and introduces MICA, a governance schema for AI context management.
Your Agentic Stack Has Two Layers. It Needs Three.
Most agentic stacks cover tools and skills, but miss intent governance. Learn why a third layer is needed to stop AI drift, scope creep, and technically correct systems heading in the wrong direction.
I’m Not Building AI Demos. I’m Building AI Audits (ASDP + Slop Gates)
Learn how ASDP and AI Slop Gates turn AI trust into auditable evidence, with CI/CD checks, drift policies, and governance artifacts that block weak, narrative-driven systems.
Undo Beats IQ: Building Flamehaven as a Governed AI Runtime (Not a Prompt App)
Project note, essay, or technical log from the Flamehaven writing archive.
Showing page 1 of 2 · 17 matching posts